Bart D. Ehrman, Forged: Writing in the Name of God—Why The Bible’s Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are (San Francisco: HarperOne. Forged – Writing in the Name of God–Why the. Bible’s Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are. By Bart D. Ehrman. Publisher: HarperOne. Full text of “Bart D. Ehrman – Forged: Writing In The Name Of God – Why The Are Not Who We Think They Are Bart D. Ehrman HarperCollins e-books To Sierra .

Author: Akishura Kazikora
Country: Anguilla
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 7 December 2012
Pages: 79
PDF File Size: 20.20 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.87 Mb
ISBN: 749-4-74245-468-9
Downloads: 40329
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Douzil

My larger point, before I got off-track with whatever it was I was ranting about, is that this book puts the era the N.

Similarly, we all have been told how spinach has a ton of iron in it. My definition of a forgery, then, is a writing that claims to be written by someone a known figure who did not in fact write it. A more common word for this is forgery. He asks the crowds if they will believe if he can make the eurman fish come back to life. I found that odd. He spent some time in jail as a young adult, having been caught forging lunch vouchers.

This was for a simple reason: In summary, egrman very interesting book that anyone who is interested in Christianity or general history should read. Forged is rorged of the good ones, though. The author, in other words, knows of a letter in circulation claiming to be by Paul that is not really by Paul.

But he is not without bias, although he likes to think so – he comes always with a skeptic mind and are fast to point out his Christian history and how he was before a foregd Christian, but now a skeptic agnostic. Ancient writers repeatedly warned their readers to be on the lookout for forgeries and not to trust everything they read.

Forged – Writing in the Name of God – Bart D Ehrman

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Sometimes it just is too obvious it is a sham, other times not at all – so this says something about the writer, the motivation, the goal – because a “bad” forger is motivated by deceit, the “good” forger by getting the right message through.

These authoritative authors produced authoritative teachings. Ehrman insists forfed the Gnostics were Christians in the same sense as the Orthodox or what he would call the proto-Orthodox.


He has made the case well in relation to Greco-Roman culture, but not with regard to Jewish and the earliest Christian writing. They were stories intending to convey some kind of true understanding of the divine realm and humans’ fotged to it.

So, his larger agenda is broader in scope.

Most Christians can’t even answer simple question I would suggest that every Christian read this book, but you could give all the evidence in the world – you could give concrete proof – that the Bible is an imperfect, fallible, and very human book, and most Christians would still believe it’s the inerrant and perfect “Word of God.

But these “truths” stood at odds with what other leaders and teachers said were the teachings of the apostles. I was told throughout my seminary and early religious training that forgery and This book felt like an easy walk and discussion with the author.

Early Christians realized that there were numerous forgeries in circulation, and they wanted to know which books were written by their alleged authors and which were not.

Forged: Writing in the Name of God

Forged demonstrates that this is incorrect and the practice would have been condemned as dishonest by all authorities in antiquity. I also love just how unbiased Bart’s writing is. For instance, we read: It’s very simple – forgers claimed to be apostles or disciples of Jesus because they knew it would ehtman authority to what they wrote.

Our earliest Gospel, Mark, seems to suggest that the decision to have Jesus killed is shared by the Jewish leaders and the Ro- man governor Pilate although even here Pilate’s hand seems to be forced.

Review of Bart Ehrman’s book “Forged: Writing in the Name of God” – Risen Jesus, Inc.

He notes that it’s clear that Jesus of Nazareth had siblings, and that James was said to be one. HarperOne Publishers Publication Date: He describes how Paul’s views of women in the legitimate writings are different from those in the forgery ehrmab Paul’s name.

If you are an evangelical Christian, it leaves you in the wilderness outside the evangelical camp, but with an unrepentant view of gart. They do say that Jesus was buried and indicate that on the third day his tomb was empty, but they do not narrate the account of his actually emerging from the tomb.


To forestall the outcome, he forged a list of names of political leaders whom the emperor had supposedly decided to have executed for treason and put the forged list into circulation. Still, there were instances in which forged books could turn a profit, as we learn from a famous author named Galen, a second-century physician who lived in Rome. He intentionally claimed to he someone he was not.

His concerns are not those of James of Jerusalem These forgeries simply added fuel to the fire. It probably is time we stopped blaming the Jews for the death of Christ. As Jesus himself had said, “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

And the cross is said to have proclaimed its message, the news of the salvation brought to those who are “asleep,” that is, to those who are already dead and waiting for the salvation to come. But as it turns out, there are also two kinds of pseudepigraph- al writings. The general tendency in the early Church was to exclude rather than include.

I would suggest that every Christian read this book, but you could give all the evidence in the world – you could give concrete proof – that the Bible is forgrd imperfect, fallible, and very human book, and fprged Christians would still believe it’s the inerrant and perfect “Word of God.

But one of those reasons I want to elaborate upon; it is the baet of Bart Ehrman’s Forged: Let me emphasize that this is not for religious or theological reasons—for instance, that these and these alone can be trusted. Another implication is that every forgery, especially if it has survived to surface in the present day, had a community that not only revered it but also lovingly copied, preserved and even translated it.

If you had believed that the Bible is the inerrant word of God and discovered otherwise through your textual egrman studies, you will want to spread the word with a missionary zeal.

Fogred do we know this?